Monday, April 7, 2014

What Goes around Comes Around; A Rhetorical Analysis of a Popular YouTube Video

Again this is another English writing assignment. If you are unfamiliar with the video, here is a link for the video that I will be analyzing. Inspirational Video



Amy
English 1010
March 16, 2014
What Goes Around, Comes Around
            Deep within each of us is a primitive desire to help old grandmas across the street, help a new mother unload her groceries, stop the shopping carts from rolling away and hitting cars in the parking lot, or pick up a child’s dropped toy. To many, this is not considered heroic, but in fact it is these simple kindnesses and everyday acts of service that affect us most of all. A YouTube video posted on September 13, 2013 highlights one these selfless acts; giving of our time to help those in need.
During the 3 minute and 20 second video clip, a young boy is caught by a shopkeeper for stealing medicine for his mom. Instead of standing by and watching, another shopkeeper from a neighboring shop pays for the medicine, and gives the child some extra vegetable soup that he always has on hand to help the poor and homeless. Without thanking the kind man for the soup and medicine, the child runs off. 30 years pass and the video shows the same kind shopkeeper, well now into his senior years, giving vegetable soup to another man who was clearly homeless. Seconds later the shopkeeper falls and seriously hurts his head. The daughter receives the medical bills, for 742,000 Thai baht which is the equivalent of around $24,546.46. Anxious about paying the bills, the daughter decides that it was best to sell the shop that the old shopkeeper owned for over 30 years. Miraculously, the next morning she finds a note with the summary of medical charges, and is surprised to see that the bills have been paid in full with the following words written, “All expenses paid 30 years ago, with three packs of painkillers and a bag of veggie soup.” The note was signed by the doctor who was caring for the old, kind shopkeeper. Although the creator of the video is unknown, he evokes such an emotional response that would “transcend all cultural and language barriers”. Meaning, regardless of the language and culture that we are a native of, we cannot deny that through helping others with no thoughts of reward, there will be a day that another will do the same for us.
            The video, while filmed in the slums of Thailand, is consistent to the time and age of modern civilization. During the hospital scenes, we see modern equipment such as heart monitors, MRI images, oxygen tanks, an IV standing in the corner, and a classic hospital room with military style folded corners. We also see the usage of modern cooking utensils in the kitchen of the shop, as well as the façade of the buildings showing a modern style of architecture. In addition to the modern equipment, the cost of the modern medical procedures has drastically increased from only $2,800 per person per ten years to $7,500 in the past 20 years. (Chideya) This is essential to note when we examine the cost for all of the procedures was a staggering 792,000 Baht or $24,546.46 (Bloomberg). As new innovations in the medical world appear, so does the cost of the medical care, thus leading me to believe that this video was filmed within the last 10 years.
            Whether we know someone who is seriously ill, or we know of a friend who cares for a seriously ill person, we can unanimously agree that it is difficult to see those that we love suffer. As I watch the segment of the video as the boy steals medicine for his mother, my heart instantly breaks. The filmmaker uses that feeling to enhance the meaning, and emphasize selfless giving and awareness of other’s needs. We pity the child as he watches his mother’s health begin to fail her. It is also likely that the child’s father is either too busy working to help his wife, or completely out of the picture. As the video continues we notice the shopkeeper’s daughter standing behind her father, quietly watching on. How many times have we watched our parents selflessly serving those they know and those they don’t? Memories of my father caring for my grandfather who suffered from dementia and Alzheimer’s, or my mother taking care of my grandmother as she struggled with a broken leg during the later years of her life resurface as I put myself into the shoes of the dutiful daughter watching on. We begin to wonder; if this old shopkeeper was willing to serve the homeless, and those he most certainly didn’t know, then what can I do? By simply keeping a plastic bag with a bowl of vegetable soup inside, this man made a difference in many lives.
            The filmmaker is indeed a talented artist. He has the ability to capture the life of a modern shopkeeper in the slums of Thailand, but also capture the hardships that each family will face as they struggle to survive. The filmmaker does not try to hide the unpleasantness of living in the slums. Sometimes life is unfair and cruel and being unable to pay for medicine as you watch someone suffer is torturous. He is able to identify major problems and use them to his advantage to prove that we can make a difference by doing the small things in life. It may not necessarily mean that we should donate thousands upon thousands to charities, but we can certainly help by holding the door for someone in a wheelchair, or return a lost wallet. This video serves as a reminder that we can all help change the world one simple service at a time.
            It may be of some interest, however, to remind ourselves that the audience that the filmmaker is addressing is most likely women who grew into having somewhat substantial means of living and who may have a desire to help improve today’s society. Why? Women are generally driven by emotions while men are more driven by action. For example, if a woman approaches a man about a problem occurring in her life, the man will try to fix the problem rather than sympathizing like a female listener would. This video serves as an inspirational video, focusing primarily on an emotion that most likely women will respond to. Once a woman has confirmed the true meaning behind the movie, they will seek out the men and encourage them to do something about it, thus getting everyone involved and aware. If the female viewers have lived in a poorer family as they were young, but grew into wealth, most likely they will have a desire to help by making donations, or serving in the community in which they grew up in. Perhaps this is why it was such a struggle for the daughter to sell her father’s shop; she grew to love the people in the neighborhood in which she served.
            While many of us wish to help anyone in need, it is impossible to help everyone we see. The video encourages us to help when we can, where we can, and keep an eye out for the needs for others. We can achieve great things if we all work together. The filmmaker exhorts us to consider those around us and see if we can help them in any way, and then act upon it. Because shopkeeper’s store was located in the slums of Thailand, he tried to help those who did not have enough food by giving them a bowl of soup. At the end of the video, the filmmaker states that, “Giving is the best communication.” How true that is, if we can just give of our time to help others, or give extra food to the food bank, we could be helping countless people without realizing it. Those simple acts of kindness and service that are often given without regard for rewards are overlooked, but these simple services happen every day, and are more powerful and effective than we may think.
            The example the shopkeeper sets for his daughter is an example that we should all follow. While watching this video, we are reminded that we can make a difference in the world filled to the brim with hatred, hunger wars, sickness and poverty. This video inspires us to be aware of the needs of others and try to help wherever it is possible. The universal desire to help those that are weak and sick is one that is primitive. No matter what we do during the day, we can all spare time to help lift a heavy bag of dog food into a trunk, or clean up spills that inevitably appear in on the floor of the break room. Even the simplest of day to day activities can be an opportunity to help those in need. This video of a simple man who cared enough to give up his time and effort to help the poor and homeless serves as a reminder to us all.


  

 

Works Cited

Bloomberg. 19 March 2014. 19 March 2014.
Chideya, Farai. "Forbes." 2 July 2012. 5, 10, 20 Years in the Past and Future. 19 March 2014.
Inspirational Video Everyone Should Live By. Perf. AmazingLife247. 2013. YouTube.
Populaion Reference Bureau. 19 March 2014. 19 March 2014.

Sunday, March 2, 2014

A Frozen Inferno

I wrote this paper for my English class as an assignment. I hope you enjoy!



Amy
English February 13, 2014
A Frozen Inferno
Over the last twenty years, animation has become a more and more refined, and accepted medium for movies. The overwhelming popularity and the success of The Lion King paved the way for more animated films to find the theaters. It is no surprise that Disney’s latest animation creation is, again, a huge success. It has reported that Frozen is “on it’s way to becoming the highest grossing Disney Animation release in history.” (Busch) It has graced the theaters and warmed children’s hearts; bringing a mystical tale of adventure, sacrifice, and incorporating elements of humor in the form of a talking snowman named Olaf. However, movie critics spy Christian themes permeating the façade of gaiety. One particular critic, an assistant history professor at Huston Baptist University, Collin Garbarino, finds similarities of Dante’s Inferno to the protagonist, Elsa; Satan and Elsa both are trapped and long to be free (Hallowell). Although many movie critics rightly see parallels with Christian beliefs, it is difficult and unfair to the creators of Frozen to cast their characters into molds that they cannot fill.
Dante’s Inferno is one of the three adventures which Dante undertakes. Dante is led by Virgil to see the nine circles of hell. Each to represent one of the nine deadly sins i.e. lust, gluttony, treachery, malice, and pride to name a few. After experiencing eight of the circles, the last is where the treacherous reside. Dante describes the final circle as a frozen inferno. A frozen lake traps the tortured souls chin-deep in ice, and in the center of the lake sits Satan. After watching the movie Frozen, Collin Garbarino, like most other movie critics, saw Christian themes emphasizing that Frozen the most Christian movie of the year. In reality, the movie Frozen was based off of Hans Christian Anderson’s The Snow Queen in which a queen uses her magical powers over the ice and snow to bewitch a young boy whose name is Kai and trap him in her domain for eternity. To the rescue comes Gerda who also faces a number of difficult trials and uses her pure love for Kai to melt the shards of a magical mirror, which prevents Kai from seeing and feeling the good in life, embedded into his heart and eyes (The Snow Queen). Both Inferno and The Snow Queen are uniquely tied into the plot of the movie. For example, in Dante’s Inferno, Satan is trapped in a frozen hell. Each time he tries to escape using his six wings, he refreezes the lake with the icy blast. Similar to Satan, Garbarino argues that both Elsa and Satan are trapped when they decide to use their gifts for their own benefit. Both long to be free. Both are trapped within their gifts. In these ways, Garbarino makes connections to Christian beliefs and the movie Frozen.
I can see how these movie critics see Christian themes woven into the plot of Frozen however, I can only briefly see the correlations that Collin Garbarino makes. Granted, Elsa is isolated in a frozen prison, but that is where the similarities end. Elsa flees her kingdom because of her own uncertainty and fear of her gift. She does not want to hurt those who she loves the most: her kingdom, her foreign acquaintances, and most importantly, her sister, Anna. Elsa makes an honorable sacrifice to leave all that she has ever known to preserve the wellbeing of all under her care. Satan on the other hand is trapped because he was fully aware of the treachery he elicited against God and consequently he is condemned. He makes no attempt to help people; rather he would drag them down to become miserable with him. To compare Elsa and Satan is very difficult to do. It tends to become a blanket; sugarcoating the details that are crucial to understanding Elsa.
“But wait!” some parents may say, “What about Elsa’s ballad? She blatantly states ‘No right, no wrong, no rules for me. I’m free…’ Isn’t that what Satan would say; giving permission to our children to not listen to their parents and obey the rules that we establish?” It certainly could be interpreted in this way, but that is not really why Elsa states this line. She is merely stating that she is free from the burdens of becoming a queen; always being on guard and concealing her power. Personally, I feel that we are over-analyzing this movie. Prince Charming, or rather Prince Hans of the Southern Isles, for example, is really the bad guy. We all tend to perceive the prince as a stereotypical honorable, dark, tall and handsome kind of guy, who swoops in just in the nick of time, and manages to barely defeat the monster, and thus saving the day. I couldn’t help but saying to myself when he shows his true colors , “I didn’t see that one coming!”. As it turns out, Prince Hans is really the satanic figure of the entire movie. Similar to Satan, Hans hides behind his appealing looks and personable attitude to gain what we most wants in the end – power. Hans deceives everyone into believing that Elsa is the treacherous evil sorceress with magical powers, and who can only be stopped by execution. Hans is willing to do whatever it takes to achieve his goal. Elsa only suffers from the fear within herself and the fear of her kingdom. She doesn’t have any desire to manipulate. Movie critics tended to overlook the Prince and his wrong doings, when really if anyone was to be cast into Christian molds, Hans is the clear cut guy to claim the satanic role.
Frozen is one of those rare movies that can be enjoyed by all ages. It provides the classic Disney adventure and romance, simultaneously integrating an old folk tale into a sparkling and fresh story. Anna and Elsa both provide a new perspective on a classic Disney princess. Frozen is exhilarating, but often debated. Elsa does prove to share similarities to Dante’s Satan, and Hans Christen Anderson’s Snow Queen, however to cast the unique characters of Frozen into molds that they cannot fill is extremely difficult. Elsa is her own unique and individual character; unable to be accurately described as the satanic figure of the movie. Despite the debating over the roles of each character, Frozen continues to be a favorite among children, teens, and young adults alike.




Works Cited

Busch, Anita. 'Frozen' Becomes Shining Star for Disney: Surpasses $300M Domestically, at $655M Worldwide to Date; Is Broadway Next? 6 January 2014. 13 February 2014.
Garbarino, Collin. Exploring Dante's Inferno in Disney's Frozen. 19 December 2013. 18 February 2014.
Hallowell, Billy. Does Popular Kids' Movie Have a Covert Christian Message? 27 Janurary 2014. 13 February 2014.
The Snow Queen. n.d. 19 February 2014.


Thursday, February 6, 2014

Cochelar Implants; A conflict of Identity and Technology

For my English class, I have been asked to write on a controversial issue that matters to me. I have, for the last 4 years, been involved in the Deaf community and I have expeirienced their culture. This is my own opinion. Enjoy!

-----



Amy
January 21, 2014
Conflicts of Identity and Technology
            Throughout the ages, people with hearing loss were considered less than people. They were shunned to the darkest of neighborhoods, and given the least favorable jobs.  They had to scavenge for food, and were forced to live in an insane asylum. They were feared due to suspicion, and excluded for their lack of conversational skills. Up until the last two hundred years, life for the deaf and hard of hearing was a constant struggle to survive. Thankfully, there was hope on the horizon. Education improved and more opportunities were available to the deaf. The cochlear implant was first patented in 1985 and provided many deaf individuals with the ability to hear again. (Carol Padden) It was a wonderful discovery; it allowed the deaf to hear again. Despite this miraculous discovery, many Deaf people found it difficult to accept the new technology as beneficial to their culture, and  perceived the device as an attack to their individual worth.
            Recently, I interviewed my hearing friends and family on their stand with implanting deaf children. The majority of my friends and family told me that they would implant children as quickly as possible while the child’s brain is still in the process of developing a spoken language. The majority also told me that they would send their child to a hearing school where no signed language is used; reasoning that when they become older the children would work and socialize in a hearing environment. While I agree that the deaf always will be a minority in a hearing world, I disagree with giving them an implant simply as a cure for deafness without embracing the child’s unique culture to which they belong. A cochlear implant is a device that is surgically implanted into the cochlea of the inner ear. The cost of the implant ranges from $45,000 to $100,000 dollars. In addition to the cost of the surgery, the child must undergo strenuous hearing and speech training sessions conducted by professionals. Doctor visits and regular checkups to monitor the implant and health of the child must be frequent as well. If the child’s health is not monitored, the individual could face infection of the inner lining of the brain or skin around the implant, and cranial nerve damage and even paralysis in extreme cases. (Food and Drug Administration) Even if the cochlear implant is successful for the child, the family must be willing to sacrifice time and money. The hearing groups that I interviewed were unaware of these serious complications that could result from a technological failure. It seems that they have only considered the benefits, but not the risks involved with this procedure.
            My hearing friends and family are mistaken when they argue that the cochlear implant will give them a more fulfilling life. As much as we want to believe that the cochlear implant is a “cure” to deafness, it is not. Regardless of having a cochlear implant, the individual will always be considered disabled. Being able to recognize sound does not enable the person to magically become “normal”. You would still apply these same principles to the elderly who use hearing aids. When wearing the hearing aids they have the ability to recognize sound, but as soon as you take the hearing aids away, they are no longer able to hear. The cochlear implant is, for lack of better words, a glorified hearing aid. Success varies depending on the person, but the greatest success is found with those who have some residual hearing left or those who have had exposure to spoken language, not in children. (Carol J. Erting) Even at the best of times, the ability to recognize sound will be shaky. After associating with hearing and deaf family members and while actively seeking a career within the Deaf culture, I must concede that the opportunities available to those who can communicate orally are drastically higher than if one only knows sign language. I must maintain my position, however, that parents fully explore their options before considering a cochlear implant, and not use it as a one fix wonder.
             In contrast, I interviewed some of my friends and family who are deaf or are deeply involved in the Deaf community about giving a deaf child a cochlear implant. Generally the Deaf community feels apprehensive about the recent popularity of the surgery. Mostly this apprehension is due to the fact that their culture has been formed for only a half century. During the Second World War, more jobs were available to the deaf. Between shifts they would congregate; relaxing, and being with their own kind, and using their own language. (Carol Padden) Since then, the feeling of belonging helped stabilize and maintain the culture that many hearing people are now taking an interest to. The Deaf culture also worries that in future generations their language, culture and traditions will fade. (O'Hannlon) In addition to their fears of a dissolving culture, they foster frustration against scientists and doctors who try to “fix” their condition. In recent genetic research sponsored by the Human Genome Project, scientists successfully identified the genetic strands found in congenital deafness. (Carol Padden) To many proud deaf, this discovery could lead to selective abortions. Being deaf, or so it seemed, was undesirable and could easily be fixed by manipulating the genetic makeup of an unborn child. The possible and unethical intrusion into a child’s life only increases the apprehension of a dissolving culture.
            Within the last few decades, cochlear implants have become more accessible to those who want or need them. The issue still stands; should we give a child an implant without allowing the child to experience their own individual culture? On one hand, implanting a child within the first years of life would help the child develop oral skills that could benefit them for the rest of their life. On the other hand, the deaf community fears that the culture that they worked so diligently to establish may be threatened by the cochlear implant. The child should have their own say in the matter. After all, they will be living with that decision for the rest of their life.









Works Cited


Carol J. Erting, Robert C. Johnson, Dorothy L. Smith, Bruce C. Snider. The Deaf Way: Perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture. Gallaudet University Press, 1994.
Carol Padden, Tom Humphries. Inside Deaf Culture. First Harvard University Press, 2005.
Food and Drug Administration. Benefits and Risks of Cochlear Implants. 8 September 2010. 17 January 2014.
National Association of the Deaf. Cochlear Implants. October 2006. 17 January 2014.
O'Hannlon, Ryan. Pacific Standard. 16 January 2014. 17 January 2014.